During 1990s right-wing newspapers were notorious for their portrayal of Kurdish and socialist intellectuals: many artists, like the singer Ahmet Kaya, were forced to leave the country after editors made a habit of picking on them.
Last year a Kurdish MP was forced to resign after photographs showing him with a girlfriend were published in the papers.
You don’t have to be a psychoanalyst to guess the equation between Orhan Pamuk and Kiran Desai.
Pamuk is funny, as his first day at the Jaipur Literary Fest proved. It was messy and lacked a cohesive structure, but it served me well. I am now a mother of three children.” Everyone in the audience waited to hear, to borrow Desai’s comment, what they all wanted to hear.
The light through the window in her room is an author’s light.
In less than a fortnight, Orhan Pamuk, Turkey’s Nobel Laureate in literature, made headlines in Turkish newspapers not once, but twice.
And on the second day, Kiran gave us glimpses of her other side, the giggly side. There were also murmurs of “Is Orhan really dating this giggle-head? But it is going to take more time.” She, however, did not get into specifics. (her first novel) was very structured because I was unsure and trying to be a novelist. This novel is a reaction to Inheritance…” She did admit to her deep fear of loneliness.
This gives us some indication of the division of labour between the two: Pamuk cracks jokes and Desai giggles. Her interviewer asked her how her writing differed from her mother Anita Desai’s. And added convolutedly, “There are those who write and those who write deeply. In her mannerisms, in her voice, we can see what a deep writer she is. ” When the interviewer did mention Pamuk, she giggled and said, “So you finally asked what you really wanted to ask.” He quickly interjected, saying all he wanted to know was whether she identified with the likes of VS Naipaul, whom Pamuk had written about as crossing regions and languages. When asked why she has not written anything after winning the Man Booker prize, she admitted she is working on another novel.
“As a woman, this repressive environment forces me to become an anarchist.
It is not my relationship with Orhan that brought me into being,” she said.
Her relationship and work draw reactions Regarded by some as a provocative artist due to the heavy use of sexual themes in her works, Fişekçi said she nonetheless had a conservative family with whom she continues to share the same house.
Karolin Fişekçi has become an object of intense media scrutiny since news of her relationship with Turkey’s Nobel laureate writer Orhan Pamuk came to light. It is an objective concept; for that reason, I try not to possess Orhan.
DAILY NEWS photo, Emrah GÜREL Turkey’s Nobel laureate, Orhan Pamuk, has apparently left the country for Latin America but will eventually return, according to his lover, Karolin Fişekçi' href='/search/Karolin Fişekçi'Karolin Fişekçi, who has become an object of intense media scrutiny since news of their relationship came to light.“I do not fear losing Orhan. I let him be free,” Fişekçi, a Turkish-Armenian artist, told the Hürriyet Daily News in a recent interview.
Perhaps that is what makes me what I am,” Fişekçi said, adding that she did not care about rumors regarding an ongoing competition between Salman Rushdie and Pamuk about having relationships with young women.